THE USE OF LANGUAGE STYLE ON THE VICTORY SPEECH OF DONALD TRUMP AND JOE BIDEN
Abstract
Abstract
This study focuses on the use of Language Style in Donald Trump and Joe Biden's victory speeches and what type of Language Style is dominant in their respective speeches. The research data was collected from the internet. This research uses a qualitative approach. In analyzing the data, this study uses Martin Jooz's (1967) Theory; Frozen Style, Formal Style, Casual Style, Consultative Style and Intimate Style. This study found 50 detected data entered into the Type of Language Style in Donald Trump's speech, namely 27 Formal Style, 13 Casual Style and 10 intimate style. And the researcher also found 50 data that entered into the type of Language Style in Joe Biden's speech, namely 36 Formal Style, 11 Casual Style, 2 Frozen Style and 1 Intimate Style. It can be concluded that Donald Trump and Joe Biden use more Formal Language Style because they speak in serious situations and in a formal place. Meannwhile, they occasionally use other types of Language Style to make listeners interested and understand the message conveyed.Abstract
This study focuses on the use of Language Style in Donald Trump and Joe Biden's victory speeches and what type of Language Style is dominant in their respective speeches. The research data was collected from the internet. This research uses a qualitative approach. In analyzing the data, this study uses Martin Jooz's (1967) Theory; Frozen Style, Formal Style, Casual Style, Consultative Style and Intimate Style. This study found 50 detected data entered into the Type of Language Style in Donald Trump's speech, namely 27 Formal Style, 13 Casual Style and 10 intimate style. And the researcher also found 50 data that entered into the type of Language Style in Joe Biden's speech, namely 36 Formal Style, 11 Casual Style, 2 Frozen Style and 1 Intimate Style. It can be concluded that Donald Trump and Joe Biden use more Formal Language Style because they speak in serious situations and in a formal place. Meannwhile, they occasionally use other types of Language Style to make listeners interested and understand the message conveyed.
Downloads
References
Afriza, I. Z. R. (2017). Language style in Exclusive Interview of Jessie J and Sarah Sechan on NET TV (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim).
Budimansyah,D. dan Syam,S.(ed) .(2006). Pendidikan Nilai Moral Dalam dimensi. Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, Bandung: Lab.PKN FPIPS-UPI.
Chaer and Agustina. 1995. Sosiolinguistik: Perkenalan Awal. Jakarta: Rineka
Cipta.
Chaer, A. 2004. Tata Bahasa Praktis Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Cresweel, J. (2014). Research Design Qualitailtif, Quantialtatif. In Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics.
Holmes, J. 2013. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. New York: Longman
Joos, Martin. (1967). The Five Clocks, Newyork: Harcourt, Brace and world Inc.
Keraf, Gorys. (1991). Tata Bahasa Rujukan Bahasa Indonesia Untuk Pendidikan
Menengah. Jakarta: Gramedia Widia Sarana Indonesia.
Milroy, J. (1980). Review of Hudson (1980): Sociolinguistics. English World Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English
Mustakim. 1994. Membina Kemampuan Berbahasa: Panduan ke Arah Kemahiran
Berbahasa. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Ohoiwutun, Paul. 1997. Sosiolinguistik. Jakarta: Kesaint Blant.
Pei, M. A., Joos, M., Hamp, E. P., Householder, F. W., & Austerlitz, R. (1967). Readings in Linguistics. The Modern Language Journal.
Suroso, A. G. V. (2018). An Analysis of Speech Styles Used by Desmond Doss In
Hacksaw Ridge Movie (Sanata Dharma University Yogyakarta)
Suwito. 1992. Sosiolinguistik. Surakarta: Sebelas Maret University Press.
Syafitri, S. (2019). The Formal and Casual Language Style as Seen in Joko Widodo's selected Speechs (UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi)
Spolsky, B. (2010). Ferguson and fishman: Sociolinguistics and the sociology of language. In The SAGE Handbook of Sociolinguistics.
Trager, G. 1949. The Field of Linguistics. Norman Okla: Battenburg Press.
