INCREASING STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES IN HYDROCARBON MATERIALS THROUGH THE APPLICATION OF THE PROBING PROMPTING MODEL IN CLASS X MIPA 3 SMA NEGERI 1 BANGSAL MOJOKERTO
Abstract
The results of the observations obtained daily test scores of classes with the percentage of completeness only 60%. This shows that the learning outcomes of hydrocarbons in class X MIPA 3 SMA Negeri 1 Bangsal can be categorized as poor. To improve learning outcomes, classroom action research was conducted which consisted of two cycles. Each cycle consists of stages of planning, implementation, observation and reflection. The subjects of this study were students of SMA Negeri 1 Bangsal Class X MIPA 3 academic year 2017/2018 which consisted of 34 students. The data collection instruments were evaluation questions for the cognitive domain which were carried out at the end of each cycle and observation sheets for the affective and psychomotor domains. Based on the results and discussion, it can be concluded that learning using the probing prompting model can provide convenience for teachers in learning, make learning student-centered, complete learning outcomes, and can teach and train students' character behavior. The implementation of the lesson plans was categorized as good with an average score of 3.0 in the first cycle and 3.27 in the second cycle. Student activity reached 85.26% in the first cycle and increased to 92.22%. In the aspect of scientific behavior, both cycles show that they are in the good category. Mastery learning outcomes also showed an increase, from 73.77% in the first cycle to 90% in the second cycle.
Downloads
References
[2] Akhdinirwanto, R. Wakhid, dan Sayogyani, Ida Ayu. 2009. Cara Mudah Mengembangkan Profesi Guru. Yogyakarta: Sabda Media.
[3] Arsyad, Azhar.2010.Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
[4] Bompa, Tudor O. 1990. Theory dan Methodology of Training. Kendal: Publishing Company.
[5] Conny, Semiawan. 1992. Ketrampilan Proses Untuk Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Gramedia.
[6] Djamarah, Syaiful Bahri. 2002. Strategi Belajar Mengajar.Jakarta: Rineksa Cipta.
[7] Djamarah. Syaiful Bahri. 2002. Psikologi Belajar.Jakarta: Rineksa Cipta.
[8] Hamalik, Oemar. 2002. Psikologi Belajar dan Mengajar.Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo.
[9] Muhtarom, A., Syairozi, M. I., & Yonita, H. L. (2022). Analisis Persepsi Harga, Lokasi, Fasilitas, dan Kualitas Pelayanan terhadap Loyalitas Pelanggan Dimediasi Keputusan Pembelian (Studi Kasus pada Umkm Skck (Stasiun Kuliner Canditunggal Kalitengah) Metode Structural Equation Modelling (SEM)-Partial Least. EKOMBIS REVIEW: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 10(S1), 391-402.
[10] Nugrahanto, Agung. 2011. Peningkatan Hasil Pembelajaran Ekonomi Dengan Menerapkan Metode Probing prompting Pada Peserta Didik Kelas X 4 SMA Negeri 6 Surakarta Tahun 2010/2011. Skripsi Thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
[11] Roestiyah. 2008. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
[12] Sanjaya, Wina. 2009. Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.
[13] Sardiman. 2007. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
[14] Syairozi, M. I., & Fattah, A. (2018). “YOUTH CREATIVE ENTERPRENEUR EMPOWERMENT (YOUTIVEE)”: SOLUSI BAGI KAUM MUDA UNTUK BERKONSTRIBUSI PADA PEREKONOMIAN DAN MENGURANGI PENGANGGURAN. Jesya (Jurnal Ekonomi dan Ekonomi Syariah), 1(2), 43-55.