A Critical Discourse Analysis Anas Urbaningrum’s Representation In The Hambalang Case In Five Articles Of The Jakarta Post

  • Peberiwati br Kaban Akademi Pendidikan Kesehatan Talitakum, Sei Batang Hari Street, Medan Sunggal District North Sumatera, Indonesia
Keywords: Anas Representation, Jakarta Post, Existential clause

Abstract

This research entitles "Anas Representation's Representation in the Hambalang Case in Four Articles of The Jakarta Post”. The Hambalang case is a big corruption in Indonesia and many high-figure politicians get involved, including Anas Urbaningrum (AU) as a former chairman Democratic Party. The study is aimed to demonstrate the social practice of AU’s representation and the way of AU’s representation related to the Hambalang case in the four articles of The Jakarta Post as well as to reveal the hidden ideology when representing AU. To achieve the aim of the research, the theory of critical discourse analysis (CDA) by Fairclough (1989, 1995b, and 2010), Transitivity system by Halliday&Matthiessen (2004) and the notion of the representation of social actor by Van Leeuwen (2008) are applied. The results of the study show that based on the types of process, the AU’s representation tends to be negative in the material clause, mental clause, relational clause, verbal clause, and existential clause. In contrast, the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) is portrayed prominently in positive way with the implementation of exclusion and impersonalization. With respect to ideology, The Jakarta Post, remains focus on Pancasila democracy that grounds to values of God-centered belief, humanity with freedom and equality spirit, unity of diverse society, mutual assistance, and social justice. Through the four texts, The Jakarta Post reproduces its ideology to sustain its relationship with the KPK as Our group (anti-corruption side) in order to combat corruptions issues in Indonesia and categorizes AU as Their group (corruptors’ side).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ansar Ferdian Febian. 2012. Obejectivity of Alleged Corruption Case Coverage of The Former Youth and Sport Minister in The Hambalang Project Scandal on Online Media (Objektivitas Pemberitaan Kasus Dugaan Korupsi Mantan Menpora Dalam Skandal Proyek Hambalang Di Media Online). Indonesia: University of Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran", downloaded from http://eprints.upnjatim.ac.id/4594/1/file1.pdf
2. Bloor, Thomas and Bloor, Meriel. 2004. The Functional Analysis of English: Second Edition. London : Saffron House.
3. Chouliaraki, Lilie & Fairclough, Norman. 1999. Discourse in Late Modernity. Great Britain :Edinburgh University Press.
4. Conboy, Martin. 2007. The Language of the News. London : Routledge.
5. Deterding, David H. & Poedjosoedarmo, Gloria R. 2001. The Grammar of English. Singapore: Pearson Education Asia Pte Ltd.
6. Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Langauge and Power. New York : Longman Group Limited.
7. Fairclough, Norman, Mulderrig, Jane&Wodak, Ruth. 2011. Critical Discourse Analysis, in van Dijk, T.A. (Ed). Discourse Practice, pp. 387-378. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
8. Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, Cristian M.I.M., 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd Edition). Great Britain: Continuum.
9. Hall, Stuart. 1997. Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: Sage Publication Ltd.
10. Mayr, Andrea. 2008. Language and Power. Great Britain: MPG Books, Cornwall
11. Post, Michael David. 2009. Representation of Meaning Within Textual Personas: An Analysis of 2008 US Presidential Campaign Speeches. England: University of Birmingham, downloaded from http://ecc.isc.gov.ir/ShwFArticle.aspx?aid=140887
12. Richardson, John E. 2007. Analyzing Newspaper: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
13. Sahragard, R.,& Davatgarzadeh. 2010. The Representation of Social Actors In Interchange Third Edition Series: A Critical Discourse Analysis. The Journal of Teaching Langauge Skills (JTLS). Vol. 2, No. 1
14. Sujatna, Eva Tuckyta Sari. 2013. Understanding Systemic Functional Linguistics. Bandung: Unpad Press.
15. Van Dijk, T. A. 1993b. Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse and Society, 249-283.
16. Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.
17. Wodak, Ruth & Meyer, Michael. 2001. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London : Sage Publications Ltd.
Published
2024-03-20
How to Cite
Peberiwati br Kaban. (2024). A Critical Discourse Analysis Anas Urbaningrum’s Representation In The Hambalang Case In Five Articles Of The Jakarta Post. Jurnal Scientia, 13(02), 1365-1377. Retrieved from http://seaninstitute.org/infor/index.php/pendidikan/article/view/2331