Analysis of Literacy Program Based on Ability Level of Students in Elementary School
Keywords:
basic literacy, ability level, elementary school
Abstract
Learning based on student ability is one of the new approaches in the learning model. In general, learning is based on the class or age of students. This study aims to analyze whether the ability-based learning model is effective in improving students' abilities, especially in learning basic literacy. The study used a qualitative descriptive approach. The research location is at SDN Persil. Collecting data using observation, interviews, and documentation. The research subjects were 99 students. The results of the study indicate that ability level-based learning can improve students' basic literacy skills. The indicator of the increase in students' abilities can be seen from the increasing percentage of the number of students who advance to the story level.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
[1] Suyono, T. Harsiati, and I. S. Wulandari, “Implementasi gerakan literasi sekolah pada pembelajaran tematik di sekolah dasar,” Jippsd, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 116–123, 2014.
[2] Smeru Research Institute, “Sintesis Hasil Studi Diagnostik Pembelajaran Pendidikan Dasar di Enam Kabupaten Mitra INOVASI di Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat,” Jakarta, 2016.
[3] B. Antoro, Gerakan Literasi Sekolah. Dari pucuk hingga akar. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2017.
[4] M. Erfan, M. A. Maulyda, L. H. Affandi, A. N. K. Rosyidah, I. Oktavianti, and I. Hamdani, “Identifikasi Wawasan Literasi Dasar Guru Dalam Pembelajaran Berbasis Level Kemampuan Siswa,” J. DIDIKA Wahana Ilm. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2021.
[5] A. Widodo and U. Umar, “Inclusive Primary Schools Without Shadow Teachers: Can Learning Services be Optimal?,” J. Educ. J. Educ. Stud., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 149, Dec. 2020.
[6] Pusdikjar, AKM dan Implikasinya pada Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Pusat Asesmen Dan Pembelajaran Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Dan Perbukuan Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 2020.
[7] D. Saryono et al., Materi pendukung literasi baca-tulis. 2017.
[8] S. Anggraini, “Budaya Literasi Dalam Komunikasi,” Wacana, vol. XV, no. 3, pp. 181–279, 2016.
[9] A. Banerjee et al., “Mainstreaming An Effective Intervention: Evidence From Randomized Evaluations Of ‘Teaching At The Right Level’ In India,” Cambridge, MA, 22746, 2016.
[10] S. Lakhsman, “Improving reading and arithmetic outcomes at Pratham ’ s approach to teaching and learning Improving reading and arithmetic outcomes at scale : Teaching at the Right Level ( TaRL ), Pratham ’ s approach to teaching and learning,” Rev. Int. d’éducation Sèvres, vol. 1, no. June, pp. 1–6, 2019.
[11] R. Banerji and M. Chavan, “Improving literacy and math instruction at scale in India’s primary schools: The case of Pratham’s Read India program,” J. Educ. Chang., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 453–475, Nov. 2016.
[12] S. M. Mueller and M. Brand, “Approximate Number Processing Skills Contribute to Decision Making Under Objective Risk: Interactions With Executive Functions and Objective Numeracy,” Front. Psychol., vol. 9, Jul. 2018.
[13] A. O. A. Awofala and A. E. Blessing, “Assessing Adult Learner’s Numeracy as Related to Gender and Performance in Arithmetic,” J. New Approaches Educ. Res., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 83–92, Jul. 2014.
[14] Pratham Education Foundation & Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab, “Evaluation of Pratham’s Learning Camps Program in Uttar Pradesh Preliminary Results,” Uttar Pradesh, 2015.
[15] Sugiyono, Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2013.
[16] N. Khasanah, “engaruh Metode Glass Analysis Terhadap Self-Efficacy Membaca Dan Reading Level ( Studi Pada Siswa Kelas 3 Sd Dengan Kesulitan Membaca Di Sekolah Inklusi Di Tangerang Selatan,” J. PsikologiMedia Ilm. Psikol., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 100–111, 2020.
[17] T. Hartati, “Multimedia Dalam Pengembangan Literasi,” Sekol. Dasar Kaji. Teor. dan Prakt. Pendidik., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 47–54, May 2016.
[2] Smeru Research Institute, “Sintesis Hasil Studi Diagnostik Pembelajaran Pendidikan Dasar di Enam Kabupaten Mitra INOVASI di Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat,” Jakarta, 2016.
[3] B. Antoro, Gerakan Literasi Sekolah. Dari pucuk hingga akar. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2017.
[4] M. Erfan, M. A. Maulyda, L. H. Affandi, A. N. K. Rosyidah, I. Oktavianti, and I. Hamdani, “Identifikasi Wawasan Literasi Dasar Guru Dalam Pembelajaran Berbasis Level Kemampuan Siswa,” J. DIDIKA Wahana Ilm. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2021.
[5] A. Widodo and U. Umar, “Inclusive Primary Schools Without Shadow Teachers: Can Learning Services be Optimal?,” J. Educ. J. Educ. Stud., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 149, Dec. 2020.
[6] Pusdikjar, AKM dan Implikasinya pada Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Pusat Asesmen Dan Pembelajaran Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Dan Perbukuan Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 2020.
[7] D. Saryono et al., Materi pendukung literasi baca-tulis. 2017.
[8] S. Anggraini, “Budaya Literasi Dalam Komunikasi,” Wacana, vol. XV, no. 3, pp. 181–279, 2016.
[9] A. Banerjee et al., “Mainstreaming An Effective Intervention: Evidence From Randomized Evaluations Of ‘Teaching At The Right Level’ In India,” Cambridge, MA, 22746, 2016.
[10] S. Lakhsman, “Improving reading and arithmetic outcomes at Pratham ’ s approach to teaching and learning Improving reading and arithmetic outcomes at scale : Teaching at the Right Level ( TaRL ), Pratham ’ s approach to teaching and learning,” Rev. Int. d’éducation Sèvres, vol. 1, no. June, pp. 1–6, 2019.
[11] R. Banerji and M. Chavan, “Improving literacy and math instruction at scale in India’s primary schools: The case of Pratham’s Read India program,” J. Educ. Chang., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 453–475, Nov. 2016.
[12] S. M. Mueller and M. Brand, “Approximate Number Processing Skills Contribute to Decision Making Under Objective Risk: Interactions With Executive Functions and Objective Numeracy,” Front. Psychol., vol. 9, Jul. 2018.
[13] A. O. A. Awofala and A. E. Blessing, “Assessing Adult Learner’s Numeracy as Related to Gender and Performance in Arithmetic,” J. New Approaches Educ. Res., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 83–92, Jul. 2014.
[14] Pratham Education Foundation & Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab, “Evaluation of Pratham’s Learning Camps Program in Uttar Pradesh Preliminary Results,” Uttar Pradesh, 2015.
[15] Sugiyono, Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2013.
[16] N. Khasanah, “engaruh Metode Glass Analysis Terhadap Self-Efficacy Membaca Dan Reading Level ( Studi Pada Siswa Kelas 3 Sd Dengan Kesulitan Membaca Di Sekolah Inklusi Di Tangerang Selatan,” J. PsikologiMedia Ilm. Psikol., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 100–111, 2020.
[17] T. Hartati, “Multimedia Dalam Pengembangan Literasi,” Sekol. Dasar Kaji. Teor. dan Prakt. Pendidik., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 47–54, May 2016.
Published
2021-08-31
How to Cite
widodo, A., & Umar, U. (2021). Analysis of Literacy Program Based on Ability Level of Students in Elementary School. Jurnal Scientia, 10(1), 71-76. Retrieved from http://seaninstitute.org/infor/index.php/pendidikan/article/view/185
Section
Articles
